This book is one of the most sold worldwide and has many readers it has worked the spells of the Book. Why do you care so much to pass the Books of Simon as false? Probably just for fame and for be accepted in society, now:ĭo you have evidence that the Simon Necronomicon is false? On at 9:16 pm Sacerdos-Magus ex Marduk said: Some thoughts on the Necronomicon as a “cheap” book. If “Simon” wants to be known as a magical authority, what are his credentials? Does he himself practice magic? Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8.Ī discussion of the Necronomicon Spellbook, and the changing story of its appearance. What about Huwawa, or Humwawa, or Humbaba in the Necronomicon? Just to be different, we have Part 0, Part. Austine Waddell? Who’s James Madole? Why does the Necronomicon talk about the Aryan race? Why does “Simon” pretend like he doesn’t know anything about it? Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5. How about Roman Polanski, Johnny Depp, and the true origins of the Ninth Gate? See the FAQ. Is the Necronomicon really dangerous? What about the crimes of Roderick Ferrell and Glen Mason? And if it’s not, why does “Simon” keep saying it is? Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Is Cthulhu in the Koran? The source is revealed! Part 1, Part 2.ĭid the Golden Dawn own the Necronomicon? What of the Veils of Negative Existence? Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.Ĭan Aiwass be compared to the mindless chaos Azathoth or Azag-Thoth? Part 1, Part 2.Īre the Gates of the Necronomicon as “Simon” presents them historically accurate? Are they even in the right order? Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Is Cthulhu mentioned in the Hebrew Key of Solomon, or Mafteah Shelomoh? Part 1, Part 2. “Simon’s” reason for using a pseudonym in Dead Names makes no sense. How do we know the Miskatonic isn’t a reference to “chthonic”? Find out here. Some random thoughts on mental flexibility, here. “Simon” makes Enki the fall guy for his own poor grasp of cosmology. Is “Kutulu” actually Sumerian? Find out here. What is the culture “Simon” forgot to include in his book, even though he mentioned it in the Necronomicon? Find out about the Mandaeans here. The Toda people – not Sumerian or even remotely as “Simon” describes them. “Simon” seeks Sumerian survivals, and comes up short here. “Simon” gets caught selling new material as old and blames his readers for being tricked. “Simon’s” claims to have read masses of scholarly literature that he quotes nowhere, and turns scholarly consensus into controversy with a few choice phrases. Why doesn’t “Simon” mention that, while he was working on his Necronomicon, Herman Slater was selling a fake one at the Warlock Shop? Find out more here. Why does “Simon” not know the formula for summoning the Watcher? And why does he blame hordes of imaginary people for giving him a hard time about it? We don’t know, but you can read more about it here.
Some thoughts on “Simon’s” account of the Necronomicon’s discovery. I’ve tried to set it up with key words, so running your browser’s search function for a keyword should yield results.Īn introduction, for those who might need one: Part One and Part Two.Īre we biased? How about “Simon”? Read more here. This page will be updated irregularly, so go to the main blog for the latest material. Herein witness the numerous errors, misrepresentations, glosses, and other problematic contents of “Simon’s” Dead Names: The Dark History of the Necronomicon.
0 kommentar(er)
